#1,134 – Use “of” Terminology for Generics

It’s often the convention to use the word “of” in reading the name of a generic type, i.e. “[class] of [type]”.  For example, suppose that you define the following type:

public class Pile<T>
{
   // stuff here
}

You’d typically refer to this generic type as “Pile of T”.

Suppose that you then declared an instance of the constructed type as follows:

Pile<Dog> dogPile = new Pile<Dog>();

You’d then refer to this constructed type as “Pile of Dog”.

Advertisements

About Sean
Software developer in the Twin Cities area, passionate about software development and sailing.

One Response to #1,134 – Use “of” Terminology for Generics

  1. Pingback: Dew Drop – July 10, 2014 (#1811) | Morning Dew

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: